• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
OII Europe

OII Europe

Organisation Intersex International Europe

  • News
  • Demands
    • Malta Declaration
    • Statement of Riga
    • Vienna Statement
  • Areas of Work
    • Awareness Raising
    • Community & Capacity Building
    • Policy Work
    • Refugees & Asylum Seekers
    • Strategic Litigation
  • Resources
        • Policy Resources
          • European Union
          • Council of Europe
          • United Nations
          • Submissions
          • Issues - a short list
          • Infographics
        • Publications
          • Covid-19 ReportOur Report on the impact of Covid-19 on intersex people
          • Good Practice MapOur annual Good Practice Map highlights positive developments for intersex people in Europe
          • #MyIntersexStoryPersonal accounts by intersex people living in Europe
          • Publication ArchiveAll items listed under the category OII Europe Publications
        • Our Toolkits
          • Legal ToolkitProtecting Intersex People in Europe: A toolkit for law and policy makers
          • Parents' ToolkitSupporting your intersex child – A parents’ toolkit
          • Toolkit For AlliesStanding up for the human rights of intersex people – how can you help?
        • Organisation
          • OII Europe Flyer
          • Annual Reports
          • Job Opportunities
          • Becoming a Member of OII Europe
          • Frequently Asked QuestionsSome FAQ’s and searching the website
        • Further Advocacy Resources
          • Press ReleasesA selection of our press releases
          • TopicsThis section provides posts on dedicated topics
          • Videos
          • Intersex Voices
        • Community Resources
          • Community & Capacity BuildingLearn more about our Community & Capacity Building program
          • IntervisibilityMultilingual Community Website
          • Community PostsFind community-related posts & events listed here
          • Join our Newsletter
        • Campaign Websites & More
          • #MyIntersexStoryTestimonies of intersex people in Europe
          • Intersex LivesDreams, hopes, joys and worries of intersex people in Europe
          • 10 Years IIF10yr anniversary since the 1. International Intersex Forum (IIF)
          • Our Infographics sub-website
        • Additional projects
          • Strategic Litigation
          • Refugees & Asylum SeekersLearn more about our Refugees & Asylum Seekers Program
          • Translations
          • Areas of WorkSee also the menu item AREA OF WORK
        • USE OF OUR MATERIALS
          • For your considerationYou are welcome to share the information and materials you find on our website. If not indicated otherwise all of our publications are based on the Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which means you can share it while not changing any of its content and appearance and properly attributing OII Europe (and other collaborators of the specific item). If you would like to translate or utilize parts or whole items please make sure you contact us beforehand. Thank you :)
  • About Us
    • About OII Europe
    • Board & Staff
    • Job Opportunities
    • Becoming a Member
    • Join our Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

A good first step: Germany adopts law banning IGM. But there is still room for improvement

March 30, 2021 by Editorial

Download as PDF

On March 25, 2021, the German Bundestag adopted a draft law from the federal government “for the protection of children with variants of sex development”i (19/27929). The law provides a first, yet non-comprehensive, framework to protect intersex children from non-vital, non-emergency medical interventions.

“This law is the result of more than 25+ years of intersex activism in Germany and we are very glad to see the years of work of national intersex activists have finally come into fruitition”, says Dan Christian Ghattas, Executive Director of OII Europe: “We congratulate the German Bundestag for taking this first step towards protecting intersex children from non-vital medical interventions. However, while the law sets a good frame only time will show whether this frame allows for a comprehensive protection of all children with variations of sex characteristics. We therefore especially applaud the German parliament for acknowledging the work in progress character of this law for including in the law a provision and a set of questions that will, in 5 years time, guide the evaluation of the law. This measure shows that the German Bundestag is aware and acknowledges some of the risks and possible legal gaps of the current version law and is committed to extent the protection in the future. We also sincerely congratulate all MPs who voted against a tabled proposal to explicitely exclude intersex children with a CAH diagnoses from the protection offered by the law. These children are one of the biggest group suffering from non-vital medical interventions.”

“We see a lot of the positive points in the adopted law,”, continues Miriam can der Have, Co-Chair of OII Europe, “But we also see risks and gaps that need to be monitored closely. The law, for instance, limit its protection to those children who are diagnosed along the current medical definition of so-called DSDs (disorders of sex development). Once these definitions and diagnoses change the affected children are not covered under the law anymore and left without protection. The law itself establishes these limits. By doing so it yet again defers its politial responsibility to protect all intersex children to the medical profession”.

“Taking human rights of intersex children serious and protecting these most vulnerable members of society is an ongoing learning process”, concludes Kitty Anderson, Co-Chair of OII Europe. “We will support our German member organisation in monitoring the implementation of the law and its future evaluation.”

The law envisions three possible situations:

  1. Interventions which solely aim to “adjust”, i.e., alter the child’s physical appearance → intervention unlawful, parental consent not possible
    In this situation parental consent is not possible as the law prohibits parents or legal guardians to “consent to treatment of a child who is incapable of giving consent and who has a ‘variants of sex development’ which, without any other reason for the treatment being added, is carried out solely with the intention of making the child’s physical appearance similar to that of the male or female sex”. (§ 1631e (1.1))
  2. Interventions which are not deferrable but vital → intervention lawful, parental consent possible 

In this case parental consent is possible without any additional procedure, as the justification of the law details: “If there is a danger to life or health and an operation must be performed quickly, it must be assumed that the child would give priority to averting this danger if he or she had full capacity of understanding and judgement; such an operation is therefore permitted without authorisation under the narrow condition mentioned. […] Subsequent authorisation by the family court is not provided for in such cases. However, the possibility of a later review under criminal or civil law remains open.” (p. 28)

  1. Interventions which include the elimination or aim to eliminate a perceived functional disorder, whether or not there is actually a concrete health risk at the present time → intervention lawful, provided approval by the family court; however with the exception of interventions that become a matter of urgency

Article 1631e (2) specifies that parents may “consent to surgical interventions on the internal or external sex characteristics of a child who is incapable of giving consent and has a difference of sex development, which could result in an approximation of the child’s physical appearance to that of the male or female sex” with the exception of interventions that have the sole purpose of aligning the child’s appearance, as the latter is prohibited by § 1631e (1), and “if the intervention cannot be postponed until the child has made a self-determined decision”. 

For all interventions which fall under § 1631e (1.2) parents or legal guardians need to seek the “approval of the family court unless the surgical intervention is necessary to avert a danger to the child’s life or health and cannot be postponed until approval has been granted”. The family court may grant the permission on application by the parents if “the planned intervention is in the best interests of the child”. (§ 1631e (1.3))

In order to prove that the planned procedure is in the best interest of the child the parents need to submit to the family court an opinion of an interdisciplinary commission, which consists of the person treating the child, at least one other medical person, one person with a professional qualification in psychology, child and youth psychotherapy or child and youth psychiatry, and one person trained in ethics. At the request of the parents, the commission should involve a counselor with a variant of sex development, however this is not a requirement (§ 1631e (1.4))

If the commission is in favour of the intervention, it shall be presumed that the planned intervention is in the best interests of the child (§ 1631e (1.3)). In addition, in case of a sudden emergence of urgency the intervention can be carried out without the approval of the family court and without seeking any subsequent confirmation from the court after the intervention has taken place.

While these articles, at first glance, seem to ensure a protection of intersex infants and children from non-vital medical interventions, the details show a much more complex picture, which includes clear pros but also, as a con, loopholes and a risk of possible circumvention of its essential aim.

On the positive side the law

  • provides a first, yet non-comprehensive, framework towards protecting intersex children from non-vital, non-emergency medical interventions
  • makes surgeries that are soley performed for the reason of altering the child’s body to a more normative appearance and without fully informed consent of the intersex child unlawful 
  • provides for a family court approval procedures for interventions that are to be carried out with the aim to eliminate a perceived functional disorder at the present date or in the future
  • provides for an interdisciplinary commission to determine whether such a planned intervention, is to be considered to be in the best interest of the child; the law also includes a set of questions that the opinion needs to address (§ 1631e (1.5))
  • does not follow the proposal tabled by one party to explicitly exclude children with a CAH diagnoses from the legal protection; this is especially important as these children make up one of the biggest groups suffering from non-vital interventions 
  • extends the retention period for medical records for treatment of children with variants of sex development until the age of 48 (§ 1631e (1.6))
  • provides for an evaluation of the law after 5 years (§ 1631e (6)) and an obligatory examination by the Federal Government about whether an extension of the provisions is appropriate in the following respects:
    • “1. extending the family court approval procedure to additional types of treatment or to additional groups of children,
    • 2. introduction of a procedure for verifying the capacity of a child to give consent,
    • 3. introduction of requirements for the treatment of children with differences of sex development who are capable of giving consent,
    • 4. introduction of an obligation to seek independent advice on dealing with variants of sex development, and
    • 5. inclusion of a provision on the costs of the opinion of the interdisciplinary commission.”
  • the justification of the law mentions some of the most common non-vital interventions and uses them as an example of interventions family courts should consider to be falling under § 1631e (1.1) and hence as prohibited; while having not binding force this addition can give some guidance in family court procedures

Central obstacles that the law places in the way of comprehensive protection of intersex children are:

  • lack of universality: 
    • the law only protects children with a so-called ‘difference of sex development’ the law fails to protect all intersex children equally,
    • as detailed in the justification of the act, § 1631e (1.2) allows for interventions that are “necessary to cure or eliminate a functional disorder or to maintain reproductive capacity without there being a concrete health risk at the present time”, even if “they result in the physical appearance being adjusted” (p. 27); reports of intersex adults have shown that some of these interventions have a high risk of creating psychological trauma as well as physical health issues if they are performed at an early age and without the intersex individuals personal and fully informed consent (e.g. hypospedias repair, creation of a neo-vagina)
  • lack of a clear definition of “urgency”:
    • the law does not specify when an intervention is to be considered too urgent for a proceeding at the family court as laid down in §1631e (1.2); this is even more problematic considering that family courts are used to process urgent applications within weeks and even days and that the law does not provide for the obligation to seek the court’s consent at least a posteriori;
  • lack of full protection against possible conflict of interest:
    • the medical professional who treats the child is part of the commission  
    • the law stipulates that one of the at least two medial professionals in the commission shall not be employed in the healthcare facility where the surgical procedure is to be performed (§ 1631e (1.4)); while this stipulation aims to limit the risk, the rest of the commission can still consist of staff of this facility; there is a clear risk of possible bias, in particular considering the still prevailing medicalisation and pathologisation of intersex bodies in medical settings and healthcare facilities specialising in DSD related interventions
  • lack of guarantee of comprehensive information
    • while the law stipulates that the commission statement needs to clarify if peer counseling of the parents and the intersex child has taken place, and, if yes, whether the peer counselor supports the planned intervention, it abstains from making this peer counseling a mandatory part of such a process; hence, full information, including non-medicalized information, of the parents and the child is not ensured
  • lack of monitoring mechanism:
    • while the law provides for a set of guiding questions for possible future amendments in the context of its evaluation, it does not provide for an ongoing, accompanying monitoring mechanism
  • lack of low-threshold access to justice for future intersex adults in case the law is breached:
    • a federal central register for the storage of patient files was not introduced due to time constraints; this makes not only the monitoring difficult but will also likely have a negative impact on the accessibility of medical records for future intersex adults
    • possible penalties via the criminal and civil code but no specific provision that take into account the specific circumstances of the vulnerability of the possible victim of such a breach; in addition, as legal experts have pointed out, the presented law may be at risk to causing challenges in applying the criminal and civil code
  • lack of regulation of foreign evasion:
    • prohibited interventions on intersex children, who live in Germany, may still be performed in another country without any repercussions

— END —

Footnotes:

i The German law creates a new legal term, “Variante der Geschlechtsentwicklung” (“variant of sex development”). This terminology should not be confused with the human rights compliant term “variation of sex characteristics”. Instead it is equivalent with the diagnostic and pathologising term “disorder/difference of sex development” and used this way throughout the act.

Filed Under: Germany, Press Releases Tagged With: Germany, IGM, Legislation

Footer

INFORMATION

Intersex people from Ukraine

Support info here

Support
Policy Information
Data Protection & Privacy
Imprint

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

OII EUROPE
ORGANISATION INTERSEX INTERNATIONAL EUROPE e.V.
is a registered charitable non-for-profit-organisation
Court of Registration: Berlin-Charlottenburg, Germany
Registry Number: VR 34983 B

Address: OII Europe, GSG Höfe, Helmholtzstraße 2-9, Gebäude 7, Aufgang A, 10587 Berlin GERMANY

Sign up and join our Newsletter today

WE THANK OUR FUNDERS!

European Union

Funded by the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme (CERV) of the European Union.
Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

And we are grateful for the support by our anonymous donors

PROJECT RISE!

European Union

The project „RISE! Fighting discrimination and increasing visibility of intersex people through capacity and knowledge building" was funded by the European Union's Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme (2014-2020).
The content of this project represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.


COOPERATION PARTNERS

Heinrich Boell Foundation

OII Europe © 2012–2023
Unless otherwise specified the content of this website may be used by the following Creative Commons licence:
Creative Commons licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
CookieDurationDescription
__cf_bm30 minutesThis cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
is_unique5 yearsStatCounter sets this cookie to determine whether a user is a first-time or a returning visitor and to estimate the accumulated unique visits per site.
is_visitor_unique2 yearsStatCounter sets this cookie to determine whether a user is a first-time or a returning visitor.
sc_is_visitor_unique2 yearsStatCounter sets this cookie to determine whether a user is a first-time or a returning visitor.
vuid2 yearsVimeo installs this cookie to collect tracking information by setting a unique ID to embed videos to the website.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysA cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-cookie1 yearNo description
cookie
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo